In a significant military response to cross-border terrorism, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, 2025, executing precision strikes against nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
This strategic operation, carried out by the Indian Armed Forces, employed Rafale fighter jets equipped with sophisticated munitions to target terrorist facilities without crossing into Pakistani airspace. The operation came in direct retaliation to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives, including 25 Indian nationals and one Nepali citizen. Intelligence reports suggest that over 90 terrorists may have been eliminated in the strikes, which specifically targeted leadership elements of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), while carefully avoiding Pakistani military installations.
The Strategic Execution of Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor represented a coordinated tri-service effort involving the Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force in a rare joint sea-air operation. The Indian Air Force deployed Rafale fighter jets armed with SCALP cruise missiles and HAMMER precision-guided munitions to execute the strikes. These sophisticated weapon systems were chosen for their precision strike capabilities, with SCALP missiles specifically designed for deep strikes and HAMMER bombs providing air-to-ground precision. What distinguishes this operation from previous ones is that the strikes were conducted entirely from within Indian airspace, with the Indian Navy providing support from the sea.
The operation commenced shortly after midnight when most of India was asleep, catching Pakistani forces off guard. Special ammunition was employed to target the terror infrastructure, and despite the complexity of the mission, no Indian aircraft were lost during the operation. The precision of the strikes demonstrated significant technological advancement in India’s military capabilities, allowing for effective targeting without unnecessary escalation that could have resulted from direct incursion into Pakistani airspace.
Weapons Systems And Tactical Approach
The Rafale fighter jets used in Operation Sindoor represent the cutting edge of India’s air combat capabilities. The SCALP cruise missiles deployed have a range exceeding 300 kilometres, enabling the jets to conduct strikes from a safe distance. These missiles are designed to penetrate sophisticated air defence systems, making them ideal for such operations. The HAMMER (Highly Agile Modular Munition Extended Range) precision-guided bombs provide additional tactical flexibility, allowing for precise targeting of smaller facilities within the terror infrastructure.
Read- How to survive a nuclear attack – India-Pak War
The tactical approach employed during Operation Sindoor demonstrated a sophisticated level of military planning. By executing the operation without crossing into Pakistani airspace, India maintained what officials described as a “non-escalatory” posture while still achieving its strategic objectives. This approach minimized the risk to Indian personnel while maximizing the impact on terrorist infrastructure.
Terror Infrastructure And Leadership Targeting
The primary objective of Operation Sindoor extended beyond destroying physical infrastructure to eliminating top leadership of terrorist organizations operating from Pakistani territory. Intelligence gathered by India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) had been tracking these sites for weeks, especially following the Pahalgam attack. The operation specifically aimed to degrade the operational capabilities of groups like LeT and JeM by targeting their command and control structures.
Reports suggest that the LeT base in Muridke was struck with significant force, potentially impacting facilities linked to Hafiz Saeed. Similarly, JeM facilities in Bahawalpur received multiple strikes, particularly targeting locations associated with recent planning activities for attacks against India. By focusing on leadership and planning facilities, Operation Sindoor sought to disrupt not just current terrorist capabilities but future attack planning as well.
Command, Control, And Intelligence
The operation demonstrated a high level of coordination between India’s political leadership, intelligence agencies, and military forces. Prime Minister Narendra Modi personally monitored the entire operation from his residence at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg in New Delhi, with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval providing real-time updates throughout the mission. This direct involvement of the highest levels of government underscores the strategic importance placed on the operation.
NSA Doval played a pivotal role in the planning and execution of Operation Sindoor, reportedly chairing over 15 meetings with top defence and intelligence officials to prepare for the strikes. These extensive preparations highlight the careful consideration given to target selection, timing, and execution methods to ensure maximum effectiveness while minimising collateral damage and avoiding escalation.
Raed- Pakistan Will Respond With ‘Full Force’ To Preserve Its ‘National Prestige’ Say Asim Munir
India’s intelligence apparatus, particularly the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), provided critical target information after weeks of surveillance and intelligence gathering. This intelligence work was crucial in identifying the nine specific locations and confirming their continued use as terrorist infrastructure. The coordinates for the precision strikes were provided by these intelligence agencies, enabling the accurate targeting that characterized the operation.
Operational Restraint And Strategic Messaging
Throughout the execution of Operation Sindoor, India maintained what it described as a “focused, measured and non-escalatory” approach. The government emphasized that no Pakistani military facilities were targeted, demonstrating “considerable restraint in selection of targets and method of execution”. This restraint was a deliberate strategic choice to limit the potential for escalation while still delivering a strong message regarding India’s resolve to combat terrorism.
The military action was carefully framed as a counter-terrorism operation rather than an act of aggression against Pakistan itself. Official statements consistently emphasized that the strikes targeted only those locations from which “terrorist attacks against India have been planned and directed”. This framing sought to establish the legitimacy of the operation under international norms regarding self-defence against terrorism.
Strategic Signalling
Beyond the immediate tactical objectives, Operation Sindoor served as strategic signalling on multiple levels. To terrorist groups and their sponsors, it demonstrated India’s capability and willingness to strike terror infrastructure deep inside Pakistani territory with precision and minimal collateral damage. To the international community, it signalled India’s commitment to acting against terrorism while maintaining a proportional and targeted approach that avoided unnecessary escalation.
The codename “Sindoor” itself carries cultural significance in the Indian context, potentially symbolising the nation’s resolve and determination. The careful selection of targets associated with the Pahalgam attack established a clear cause-and-effect relationship, reinforcing the message that attacks on Indian soil would receive a calibrated but certain response.
Potential Long-Term Consequences
While the immediate military objectives of Operation Sindoor appear to have been achieved, the long-term consequences remain to be seen. The elimination of terrorist leadership and destruction of infrastructure may temporarily degrade the capabilities of groups like LeT and JeM, but history suggests these organizations often rebuild and reorganize. The psychological impact of India’s demonstrated ability to strike with precision deep within Pakistan may prove more significant as a deterrent.
The operation could also influence the broader geopolitical landscape of South Asia. Pakistan’s characterization of the strikes as an “act of war” suggests potential for further escalation. However, India’s careful approach of avoiding Pakistani military targets while clearly communicating the counter-terrorism nature of the operation provides some foundation for de-escalation if both sides choose that path.
Conclusion
Operation Sindoor represents a significant milestone in India’s approach to counter-terrorism, demonstrating both technological capabilities and strategic restraint. The precision strikes against nine terror camps in Pakistan and PoK successfully targeted infrastructure used by groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, specifically in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives in April 2025.
The operation’s execution from within Indian airspace using Rafale jets armed with SCALP missiles and HAMMER bombs showcased India’s advanced military capabilities while minimizing risks of direct confrontation. The coordinated tri-service approach involving the Army, Navy, and Air Force highlighted the evolution of India’s joint operations doctrine. Perhaps most significantly, the operation demonstrated India’s willingness to take decisive action against terrorism while carefully calibrating its response to avoid unnecessary escalation.
As the situation continues to develop, the long-term impact of Operation Sindoor on regional security dynamics and terrorist capabilities remains to be seen. However, the operation has clearly established India’s resolve to respond to terrorist attacks on its soil with precision and determination, while maintaining what it describes as a measured and focused approach to counter-terrorism.
IDN (With Inputs From Agencies)
Agencies
